Welcome to our website! The Royal Society of Edinburgh funded Eighteenth-Century Arts Education Research Network (EAERN) is a ground-breaking enterprise that brings together practitioners and scholars to investigate new approaches in using eighteenth-century arts education materials.
Over the next eighteen months, we will be holding several events that bring scholars and practitioners together who work with materials related to eighteenth-century arts education. We will be keeping this website updated with links to events, resources, audio, video and information from our network members.
We held our second research colloquium on 6 June 2018 at the University of Glasgow. Bringing together network members, researchers, and collaborators, it was an exciting day.
Professor Alexander Broadie set the tone for the day started the day on Thomas Reid and ‘Some common sense about music’. Common sense philosophers tended to think along post-Reformation lines on music: it was not for enjoyment. Thomas Reid felt a ‘natural’ way of judgment fed into all arts. Representations are of people ‘looking their best’: graceful poses, smiles, causing a naturally positive reaction in viewer. For music, this judgment is down to human nature, or the way that we are. Some people just happen to have a beautiful voice; words are only part of how we interpret information: oratory skills, gesture, facial expressions all a part as well. Music, as an imitative art, consists of two parts. Melody is akin to individual speech; harmony is conversation, including duets, complex counterpoint, with stands of conversation worked upon. Sounds we like come from an individual, alongside pauses for effect, and tension building. An imitative, expressive art arises, one that represents emotions. Composers are not just writing whatever emotion they are feeling at the time; they’re tapping into the natural understanding of peaceful or angry sounds. They can portray an angry character through musical language, rather than being angry while writing. Consequently, listeners in concert hall are not responding to anger; they are passively understanding the writing of anger in the music.
Dr Sally Tuckett on ‘Cloth, Clothing and Control at the Orphan Hospital, Edinburgh’ talked about how the day at was split between learning and manufacturing, with reading and writing a secondary concern for these children. Interestingly, clothing taught the children their place in society. ‘O’ badges on boys’ uniforms branded them orphans.
Our third speaker was Dr Mark Burden on ‘The Role of Music in Dissenting Education, 1662-1871’. Various Dissenting ministers objected to music, and attempted to use to use biblical arguments against its use, with little success.There was a surprising lack of denominational music in the repertoire of Dissenting composers or their sons. Music was seen as a means to an end, rather than an end itself in musical education, primarily to be able to sing hymns.
Our afternoon session started with PhD student Alice Little on John Machair’s art students. His ‘Observations on Landskipp Drawing’ are rules for beginners and teachers. He taught beginners in grand houses throughout Oxford, while collecting tunes from them as well. Students would give him both paintings they had made and tunes they knew.
Malchair made an appearance in Dr Matthew Sangster’s talk on ‘The Romantic-Period College in Poets’ Spheres’. The Scottish Enlightenment caused an increase of professionalization in Scottish universities, although university is rarely used in poetry.
Our last speaker was network member Dr Karen McAulay on her project Claimed from Stationer’s Hall, what happened to the music St Andrews library received. The 1827 Ladies’ Thorough Bass by Latour contains discussions on posture, harmony, and not grimacing while playing for fear of putting off the audience. Because this book survived, it indicates someone thought it useful; and it is useful to us for cultural and pedagogical research
The day ended, as last year, with a dance. We invited back two of our previous workshop guests–Aaron McGregor and Steve Player— to collaborate, as they have done previously, on historical footwork. This workshop combined analysis of dancing manuals with the steps and figures and social customs (ladies were discouraged from whistling at men across the room to summons them to dance) followed by practical work. We were able to review their previous workshops, and managed a reel of three with some success. This workshop really focused on EAERN’s main underlying principle: uniting historical theory with modern practice. Participants left energized, and wanting more. The workshop footage is avaiable to watch here.
Our thanks to Andrew Bull for manning the Twitter all day, and taking care of all other practical concerns.
James Beaton is Librarian of the National Piping Centre.
The 17th century witnessed the emergence of the piper as an important musician in the houses of the Gaelic aristocracy of the Highlands of Scotland. Writing for the Welsh linguist and antiquary Edward Lhuyd (1660-1709), Rev James Kirkwood (1650-1708/09), a Church of Scotland minister, noted that
“Pipers are held in great Request so that they are trained up at the Expence of Grandees, and have apportion of land assigned and design’d such a man’s piper” (Campbell: 49).
Evidence for the pipers being trained up “at the Expence of Grandees” is found from a number of sources from the late 17th century onwards. In 1698, the Earl of Breadalbane instructs his chamberlain as follows.
Give MacIntyre ye piper fforty pounds scots as his prentiseship with McCrooman till May nixt as also provide him in what Cloths he needs and dispatch him immediately to the Isles (Donaldson: 178).
A much fuller document in the form of an indenture between David Fraser (1716-1812) and Simon, Lord Lovat (c1667-1747) from 1743, binds Fraser to be Lovat’s piper for a period of five years. Among the other emoluments, including clothes and maintenance which Fraser was to receive from Lovat, was a provision for Fraser’s education as a piper. The indenture notes
And has also bestowed upon him during that time for his Education as a Pyper with the now deceast Evan McGrigor his Lordship’s late Pyper, And that his Lordship is now to send him upon his own Charges to the Isle of Skie, in order to have him perfected a Highland Pyper by the famous Malcolm Mcgrimon whom his Lordship is to reward for educating the said David Fraser… (Donaldson: 178).
After Lord Lovat was executed for his part in the 1745 Jacobite Uprising, David Fraser composed a beautiful lament for him. A version of this for strings and bagpipe can be heard here.
The mention of the names McCrooman and Mcgrimon is significant in the context of piping. Both names represent transliterations into Scots of the Gaelic MacCruimein, now Anglicised as MacCrimmon, a family with its origins in the Outer Hebrides in the Norse period, who were connected with a harping dynasty before turning to the pipes, and becoming one of the major piping families of the 18th and 19th centuries (Cheape, Traditional Origins: 113-114). That grandees of the status of Lovat and Breadalbane sent their pipers to the MacCrimmons for “perfecting” demonstrates their reputation and status as pipers.
As well as the MacCrimmons on Skye, there was a number of different families carrying out these functions in various parts of the Highlands. Also on the Isle of Skye was the MacArthur family. Other families included the Rankins in Mull (MacInnes I : 104-112), the MacGregors in Perthshire and the Cummings in Strathspey (Donaldson: 177).
The notion of a family or families as tradition bearers of piping and educators of pipers is an important one in the 18th century. It lies at the heart of the organisation of Gaelic society, and it also reflects a much earlier societal structure in both Gaelic Ireland and Gaelic Scotland. In this structure, families played important roles in carrying out specific elements of cultural (or what we might see now as professional) activities, under aristocratic patronage, which exchanged land and emoluments for service. The work of Professor Derick Thomson in the 1960s described these professional families, using the term “learned orders” (Thomson: 57). Among these he included poets, harpers, stonemasons, physicians and lawyers. Although the active members of these families were literate, crucial here was the transmission of knowledge and the composition of new work in a non-literate manner (Newton: 81). In terms of the poets and harpers, the key element was to compose and perform praise song/poetry which glorified and provided panegyric for their aristocratic patrons.
By the beginning of the 18th century, this older learned tradition was disappearing, but in its place a new vernacular poetry and song had emerged, within a strongly oral tradition (MacInnes, J: 273-275). The bagpipe and its music, particularly pibroch, as it is known in English or ceòl mòr, to give it its Gaelic title, were closely aligned with this (Cheape: Traditional Origins: 110), and in the broader sense of the tradition and its maintenance, piping was, at the elite level, very much organised along family lines, with various kindred in various locations in the Highlands acting as tradition bearers, educators and pipers to “grandees”.
What then, was the way in which the pipers were taught by these families? No contemporaneous accounts of the teaching methods survive from the 18th century. However, there is evidence for the means by which the tunes were transmitted from master player to pupil, and there is also evidence from the 19th century for the teaching styles of these master players, and how they went about passing the tradition on to a new generation.
In the Gaelic speaking world of the Middle Ages the oral tradition was the primary means of creation and of cultural transmission. This can be seen in the manner of composition of verse by professional poets, which required oral composition and then committing the piece to memory before it could be written down (Newton 81-84). The training of pipers by the traditional families also relied heavily on a non-literate approach to learning. However, a means of transmitting the music orally, both in terms of its melody and its embellishments, was also important and even today, a system of vocables called canntaireachd is used to help students to learn and memorise tunes, particularly ceòl mòr.
Canntaireachd is a system of singing ceòl mòr based on the Gaelic language which uses vowel sounds to represent the melody notes and consonants to represent the bagpipe’s complex embellishment system (Cannon, Piobaireachd Society: 21). Canntaireachd has a long use in Middle Irish and its descendant language Scottish Gaelic. Its first recorded use is in 1226, in the context of the obituary of an Irish harper Aed O Shochlain, who is described as “master of canntaireachd and of harp tuning” (Sanger and Kinnaird: 64).
Here is an example of a piece of ceòl mòr in staff notation with canntaireachd.
So what of the actual education itself? Evidence from the late 17th century and 18th century shows that in order for a piper to be trained by a member of the one of the traditional families it was necessary for them to travel to the home of the piper responsible for their education. The status of pipers meant that the houses were probably slightly bigger and better than the average in the area, and indeed the ruin of a house used by a member of one of the traditional piping families, the Mackays, pipers to MacLeod of Raasay, can still be seen on that island. As Cheape and Forrest note, it is an impressive structure, and a good example of the “byre dwelling” in which humans and cattle were housed under one roof, with a passage between the two (Cheape and Forrest: 165).
What of the actual teaching techniques themselves? Although no 18th century accounts of the teaching of piping survive, there are accounts from the 19th century, which give us an insight into the teaching techniques of the master players in the pre-literate era of the bagpipe. One such account was given by William MacLean (1876-1957), a master player of the late 19th and early 20th century. His playing was recorded by the School of Scottish Studies in the 1950s (an example of it can be found at this link). He was also recorded on various occasions speaking about how he learned to play the bagpipe, and how he learned the tunes which make up the ceòl mòr tradition.
MacLean’s teacher was Malcolm MacPherson, known in Gaelic as Calum Pìobaire (Calum Piper), who lived at Catlodge, about 16 miles from Dalwhinnie. He was one of the outstanding players of the second half of the 19th century (Donaldson: Dictionary of National Biography). In an interview with the School of Scottish Studies, MacLean recalled that a decision was made by his father that he “should receive the tuition of Malcolm MacPherson, the champion piper of the world in 1886…” This full interview can be heard here. It is significant that MacLean states “I was never taught by books”, and he repeats this on a number of occasions in the interview (MacLean: William MacLean and his Piping Tuition).
In a subsequent interview, MacLean went on to describe how he was taught piobaireachd by MacPherson. The story starts just after his arrival at Catlodge in November 1894.
I was warming myself at the fire…it was very cold and I got a good heat up from the peat fire and then Malcolm [Calum Pìobaire]…picked up his bagpipe and he always played with his bonnet on in the house…and started to play and I was just fairly carried away with the beautiful strong crisp notes that were coming from his fingers; and he was looking over quietly to me and seeing me swallowing it all in with my ears and enjoying it. So we started the following day; and he was very strict in his teaching…we got up at a little after eight in the morning; we had our breakfast at nine, and then we started with the practice chanter at ten o’ clock; and I had to keep going with the chanter, himself on one side of the fire and I on the other; and that went on until dinner time. Then he took me out in the afternoon, from two o’ clock to three or half past three, for a walk, and then we started the chanters again, until just about six o’ clock. And the chanters were set aside then we had to wash up and prepare for their supper old highland style substantial plain good food and then everything that I had learned on the chanter through the day; we had to play it all on the bagpipe from seven o’ clock until near bedtime. He would not give you any time to play much; no; but he never taught us on a Saturday; he gave us the Saturday off…his son Angus…and I used to go away out and hunt for hares and rabbits in the snow with a stick; to keep the pot boiling with rabbits and hares and things like that; and enjoying ourselves climbing the hills; and the same procedure started again on the Mondays(Cheape and Forrest: 180).
Pipe Major MacLean studied with Malcolm MacPherson for six months, and in that time learned some 100 pieces of ceòl mòr.
The similarities in this account with the scarce evidence from the 17th and 18th centuries, suggest that that what is being recounted by Pipe Major MacLean is a continuation of the earlier practice of the training and education of pipers in the Highlands of Scotland. There is a focus on ceòl mòr being transmitted by the vocables of canntaireachd and by rote learning; furthermore the student needs to travel to the master piper, and spends a set amount of time with him, learning tunes. The student is then equipped to play and to pass on the tradition to the succeeding generation.
The years following the Jacobite rebellion of 1745-46 were years of change for the Highlands, as it struggled to find itself a place in the newly emerging British state. One of the important changes for piping was the disappearance of the more formal role of the clan piper and indeed the piping family as a key part of the chiefly entourage. As Cheape notes
performers were eased down the social order and into the lower ranks in the Army, as the same time as the gentry-class of professional piping families demitted office and abandoned their schools (Cheap Patron as Performer: 70).
The MacCrimmon school seems to have ceased to exist by about 1770, and that of the Rankins had ceased to function by the late 1750s. However, the tradition and what appears to have been a traditional way of teaching, continued to exist, as Pipe Major MacLean’s evidence from the late 19th century demonstrates.
The education of pipers in the 18th century Highlands was deeply tied in with their role as pipers to the Highland aristocracy, and their role as tradition bearers. At the elite level, pipers travelled to piping families to learn tunes. This was done orally through vocables and the chanter. This tradition in many ways was a continuation of older learned traditions in the Gaelic speaking world of Ireland and the western seaboard of the Highlands of Scotland.
Campbell, J L (ed) (1975) A Collection of Highland Rites and Customes, Copied by Edward Lhyud from the Manuscript of the Rev James Kirkwood (1650-1709) and Annotated by him with the Aid of Rev John Beaton (London: The Folklore Society).
Cannon, R (1997) ‘The Campbell Canntaireachd Notation’ in The Piobaireachd Society’s Collection 21.
Cheape, H (2010) ‘Patron as Performer: Lament for the ‘Gentleman Piper’’ in MacLeod, W et al (eds) Bíle os Chrannaibh: a Festschrift for William Gillies (Ceann Drochaid: Clann Tuirc) pp. 57-78.
Cheape, H (2009) ‘Traditional Origins of the Piping Dynasties’ in Dickson, J (ed) The Highland Bagpipe: Music, History, Tradition (Aldershot: Farnham) pp. 97-126.
Cheape, H and Forrest, J D (2012) ‘Taigh a’ Phìobaire. The Piper’s House and the Music of the MacKays of Raasay’ Béaloideas 80 pp. 163-182.
Donaldson, W (2000) The Highland Pipe and Scottish Society 1750-1950: Transmission, Change and the Concept of Tradition (Edinburgh: Tuckwell Press).
MacInnes, I (2012) ‘The Rankine Pipers of Mull and Coll and their College at Kilbrennan Mull’ in MacLean, D and Beaton, J (eds) The Pipe Music of the Clan Maclean (West Calder: The Clan Maclean Heritage Trust) pp. 104-112.
MacInnes, J (2006) ‘The Panegyric Code in Gaelic Poetry and Its Historical Background’ in Newton, (M) (ed) Dùthchas nan Gàidheal: Selected Essays of John MacInnes (Edinburgh: Birlinn). Originally published in Transactions of the Gaelic Society of Inverness 50 pp. 435-498.
Alice Little is in the third year of her DPhil in Music at Oxford University, for which her focus is the tunebooks of John Malchair, and the collection of ‘national music’ in England in the late eighteenth century. Previous research has included the music collections of Victorian antiquary Percy Manning. Her work has been published in the Journal of Museum Ethnography, Folk Music Journal, the Handbook for Studies in 18th-Century English Music, and elsewhere. See alicelittle.co.uk for more information and to get in touch.
John Malchair (1730-1812) was a drawing master and violinist, based in Oxford from 1760 until his death. My DPhil research has focused on Malchair’s collection of ‘national music’, compiled during ‘Theleasurehowersofmanyyears’; however, this was not what brought Malchair to Oxford, nor how he paid his bills.
Malchair was a violinist, leading the band at the Oxford Music Room until 1792 when his violin was broken by an orange thrown from the audience. It was this job that brought him to Oxford in 1760, and which enabled his marriage to Elizabeth Jenner, which took place the same year. While it is likely that Malchair, as leader of the band, taught the violin, I have only discovered one reference to Malchair as a violin teacher: a note in a pocketbook of the registrar John Gutch, who noted that he had ‘Agreed with Mr. Malchair for instruction on theviolin, a guinea entrance, and a guinea for twelve lectures.’
Malchair was much better known around Oxford as an artist and drawing master, and was particularly skilled at landscapes. Malchair habitually carried a sketchbook, although was sometimes forced to recreate a scene from recollection, as he recorded in a letter of 1793 after returning from a walk near Cumnor: ‘at my return the sun being nearly setting… the waters of Brokins Wier appeared to be on fire, the Burford horizon was… Violet, Purple, and Azure…. I was so struck with all, that I retained somewhat of the effect which I committed to paper at home from recollection with some success.’
Acting as official drawing master to the university, Malchair taught a number of undergraduates as well as family members of professors, and others. Many of Malchair’s pupils’ names are recorded on the back of his works as companions on sketching expeditions. For example, one drawing is inscribed, ‘From the River in Port Meddow near Oxford July 10 1771 House Boat expedition P. Rashleigh T. Frankland Rd. Mead.’
In 1791 Malchair completed a treatise, ‘Observations On Landskipp [Landscape] Drawing’, in which he set down (in his typically eccentric spelling) some ‘Rules and Examples for the drawing of Landskipp according to the practice at Oxford’. This volume, now held at the Ashmolean Museum, includes sections on outline, materials, paper, Indian rubber, shading, and form, and is illustrated with many sketches as examples.
The lessons Malchair gives in this volume demonstrate his experience and knowledge, explaining, for example, that ‘Chalk is sharpened by cutting from the point backward, which prevents it from breaking’; as well as occasionally tending towards the poetic, as when he noted that if shading becomes smudged it can be rescued by a sharpened pencil, for ‘to that belongs the quickening and life giving power, all is made briliant by it and to spring from the paper, the point is the spirit of all.’ Malchair also included some simple practical instructions, such as ‘It is not the practice of the Oxford school to putt anny drawing tooles in the mouth.’
While ostensibly a guide for those learning to draw, Malchair also included many details for drawing masters about how to teach these skills. These tips indicate that as well as undergraduates Malchair taught young children and if his treatise reflects his own teaching style, it would appear that he had a great deal of affection, patience and respect for young learners. For example, he wrote that ‘it is certain that the young have better judgement than is generaly allowed. thire opinions are in a greate Measur thire ohn, often just and uninfluenced, sometimes so strong and natural as much to surprise thire Elders, nay even to shame them.’
However, at the same time, Malchair acknowledged the impatience often demonstrated by young people, noting that ‘Indian Rubber or Elastic Gumme is certainely usefull at times to those who less want it, but young practitioners place rather too much confidence in it, which makes them careless.’
One of the most telling remarks in this vein is Malchair’s recommendation that ‘One who would teach a Child, must draw like a child to conceal his skill as much as possible, his stile must gradualy improve as the pupil advances; he must even seeme to learne the arte – rather than to teach it.’ He goes on to say that a teacher ‘must at times confess that the task is rather difficult, for nothing is so humiliating to a learner as the Masters telling him that the verry thing which he cannot do is extreamely easy’. Such teachings are as true in the modern day and in other disciplines as they were for Malchair.
Losing his eyesight in his late 60s, Malchair officially handed over his drawing practice to William Delamotte in 1797.
Featured Image: The Holywell Music Room in Oxford. Photograph taken Beth Naught, 2015.
Douglas MacMillan is an organologist and recorder player. One of the first to study the history of the recorder in the nineteenth century, he wrote his PhD thesis on ‘The Recorder 1800-1905’. He extended his studies to the flageolet in the nineteenth century for his DMus (RCM) and has just submitted a DPhil thesis at the University of Oxford on ‘Octave Flutes in England 1660-1800’. Douglas has given conference presentations and contributed articles and reviews to learned journals.
‘The Bird Fancyer’s Delight, or Choice Observations and Directions concerning ye Teaching of all Sorts of Singing-birds after ye Flagelet & Flute, if rightly made as to Size and tone, with a Method of fixing ye wett Air; in a Spung or Cotton, with Lessons properly Compos’d, with ye Compass and faculty of each Bird, Vizt. For ye Wood-lark, Black-bird, Throstle, House-sparrow, Canary-Bird, Black-thorn Linnet, garden Bull-finch and Starling.’
Thus reads the title page to an edition of The Bird Fancyer’s Delight published in 1717.
The custom of teaching caged birds to sing was first described (at least to my knowledge) in a flageolet tutor published in 1683, and continued until the middle of the nineteenth century, but was most prevalent in the eighteenth century: there is evidence for the practice in France and Germany as well as in England. It should be pointed out that this custom is quite different from using recorders and flageolets to imitate bird-song: the birds are the singers, the musician merely the teacher. In practical terms, the bird’s cage was covered with a cloth and the instructor repeated the tunes while the bird learnt to mimic them – at least in theory! At this time, the preferred instrument would have been the bird flageolet, a tiny instrument with four finger-holes and two thumb-holes although standard flageolets were no doubt used. Later English versions of the bird flageolet surviving from the early nineteenth century had six or seven finger-holes and one thumb-hole. It was to attempt to prevent condensation in the narrow windway of the bird flageolet that the sponge chamber – a windcap containing a piece of sponge to absorb moisture – was first devised, and subsequently became a feature of most nineteenth-century flageolets. The sopranino recorder (known in England at the time as ‘flute’) could be used as an alternative instrument.
The first version of The Bird Fancyer’s Delight was published in London by Walsh in 1708, but sadly no copies survive. A further edition was published by Richard Meares in 1717, closely followed in the same year by a version by Walsh and Hare, perhaps suggesting a degree of eighteenth-century plagiarism. A final version was published by Walsh and Hare in c.1730. The Bird Fancyer’s Delight contains pedagogical material not only for the birds but also for their tutors, and it is to this material that we must now turn our attention.
The pedagogical material in The Bird Fancyer’s Delight retains – at least in part – the anachronistic system of tablature notation which was applied in the seventeenth-century flageolet tutors such as Greeting’s The Pleasant Companion and the anonymous Youth’s Delight on the Flagelet. In tablature, the fingering of the notes to be sounded were indicated as strokes on a six-line stave, each line corresponding to one of the tone-holes on the instrument similar to a modern woodwind fingering chart, although in this case the tablature was used for the melody rather than purely for instructional purposes. The time values were indicated separately above the fingerings using modern notation. This cumbersome system was also employed in part in the seventeenth-century recorder tutors but had effectively been consigned to history by the turn of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In The Bird Fancyer’s Delight, the scale is presented in both ‘dot-way’ (tablature) and ‘gamut-way’ (staff notation): the persistence of tablature into the third decade of the eighteenth century is surprising. The instructions on ‘gracing’ embracing the close shake (trill), the open shake or beat (mordent), and the slur. The material is reproduced almost verbatim from Walsh’s recorder tutor The Compleat Flute-Master of 1695, and again is rather dated, but only the close shake and slur are prescribed in The Bird Fancyer.
The Meares edition includes thirty tunes and the Walsh, forty-one. Particular keys were often assigned to individual species of bird, although the practice was not always strictly followed: the most popular bird was the bullfinch (eleven tunes), but his assigned key was C minor, hardly comfortable on a flageolet or recorder, although perhaps easier for a bird! Four of the birds were also provided with a short flourish to establish their key. Three of the tunes are given in tablature as well as in staff notation.
Unsurprisingly, the tunes are very short and are drawn from popular songs and operatic arias (particularly The Beggar’s Opera) although some were specially composed by a Mr. Hill. To give just one example, the bullfinch is assigned a triumphal march from Handel’s 1711 production of Rinaldo, duly pirated by Gaye and Pepusch to appear in The Beggar’s Opera as ‘Let us take the road’. Fortunately it is placed in the key of F rather than C minor!
The Bird Fancyer’s Delight provides us with an insight into a social practice which continued for almost two hundred years. The material is of musicological interest in that it reflects almost-lost traditions in tablature and gracing, and the selection of tunes gives an indication of popular taste in London in the early eighteenth century. Sadly, history does not relate how successful the birds were at imitating the sound of ‘the Flagelet or Flute’…
We can’t believe that it has been a year since EAERN received its funding from the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and what a year it has been! We’d like to share our years’ activities with our readers, and our plans as we enter our second year.
In May we had our first colloquium held in Special Collections at the University of Glasgow, where network members and invited guests shared their work. Bob McLean, of the University of Glasgow Archives and Special Collections, had several educational works from the 18th century on display which provided many discussion points, including Polygraphice: or, the arts of drawing, engraving, etching from 1701 that had transparent pages and the Bird Fancyer’s Delight, a short book on how one can teach one’s bird to sing using the flageolet or recorder. At the round table discussion participants began to flesh out themes across our different research areas that we hope to develop in future projects. The highlight of the event was the 18th-century ceilidh led by Aaron McGregor and the Nathaniel Gow Dance Band. The next morning was the first network meeting, where the core network met for the first time and discussed EAERN’s purpose and direction.
In September we travelled to the University of Swansea for the British Society for Eighteenth Century Studies Postgraduate Conference. We a presentation and discussion on interdisciplinary research, and how the work of EAERN could benefit postgraduates, and also what current students would like to get out of a resource like EAERN.
Our website has allowed us to share news and events and also our monthly blog series, where we have heard from different experts in the field of 18th-century studies. This is an opportunity for our core network members to share their interests and work on 18th-century education. Bloggers so far have included network members John Butt, David McGuinness, Jennifer Thorp and Karen McAulay as well as guest contributions from Nel Whiting, who spoke at our first colloquium, and Aaron McGregor, PhD student and leader of the Nathaniel Gow Dance Band.
One of the most exciting aspects of EAERN has been setting up our workshop series. The aim of the workshop series is to allow expert practitioners to demonstrate how they use 18th-century resources to learn their craft. These workshops are opportunities to share this knowledge with students, academics and interest members of the public, providing a unique networking opportunity. We have found that workshop attendees have come to workshops not necessarily connected to their discipline, which further encourages opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. Each workshop has been recorded and added to our website to allow those who could not attend to see and hear the discussion, further contributing to our worldwide community.
Workshop 1 was an opportunity to learn 18th-century Scottish country dancing, led by The Nathaniel Gow Dance Band (also known as Concerto Caledonia). The workshop attendees, including students on the Performance and Music of Scotland through the Long 18th century courses at the University of Glasgow, fellow academics, and interested parties, heard the intricate details of constructing the tunes and dances before getting the opportunity to learn a few for themselves. In the second half of the video, the dances are in full swing and Aaron and David McGuinness (one of our core network members) contributed blog posts discussing the dance band project.
Workshop 2 looked at a different aspect of dance, focusing on posture, grace and decorum rather than raucous country dancing. ‘Walk the Boards with a Natural Decorum’ brought together Jennifer Thorp (another of our core network members) and Steve Player, who discussed their different perspectives on decorum: Jennifer from the perspective of a French noblewoman, and Steve a British nobleman. In the second half of the workshop, the pair demonstrated some improvised courtly dance with elegance and grace. Jennifer discussed more of her research in a blog post, which nicely complemented her presentation.
Workshop 3 stepped out of the world of music and dance and into the realm of embroidery, an art form that dominated industry and domestic life in the 18th century. ‘Behind the Seams – A guide to 18th-century Embroidery’, presented by Auburn Lucas from the Royal School of Needlework, gave an excellent insight into the variety of embroidery collections she examined from private collectors and museums. Though many of the materials including the cloth and threads have changed, the embroidery tools and the methods are remarkably similar. Several students studying textile conservation attended as well as keen embroiderers who were excited to see Auburn’s personal work and embroidery demonstration, which can be seen throughout the video.
Plans for the New Year include three more workshops in January, February, and March continuing to explore music, fashion and theatre. We will be contributing to the Education in the Long Eighteenth-century seminar series and we hope to participate in the Eighteenth Century Scottish Studies Society conference in Glasgow in July.
We are planning another colloquium for summer 2018, where our core network will get together to discuss our ongoing work and future plans for EAERN. We will continue our monthly blog series, featuring core network members as well as guest bloggers working on eighteenth-century arts education. If you have a topic that matches the themes and aims of EAERN and would like to contribute a post, please get in touch.
For further information about our workshop series, please visit our workshop series page, follow us on Twitter @EAERNing, join our Facebook page or, if you haven’t done so yet, sign up to our email list. Speaking of which, our email list includes contacts from Europe, the United States, and Australia. We are pleased to have so many people who are interested in our work, and we would like to say thank you!
Finally, from the EAERN team, we would like to wish you a happy holiday season and all the best for 2018!
This blogpost is written by Jennifer Thorp, who is an archivist and dance historian working in Oxford. She is also a member of the EAERN steering group.
This blogpost derives from different strands of my own research and performance practice in eighteenth century dance, in the light of the cooperative ventures between academics and practitioners encouraged by EAERN. Into the melting pot have gone parts of the presentation I gave at the EAERN Colloquium in May 2017, part of my (ongoing) work to catalogue the dance section of the Montagu Music Collection at Boughton House, and performances of dances with a Montagu connection. In turn, all that has also provoked revisions and corrections (also ongoing!) to the editorial commentary on F. Le Roussau’s Collection of New Ball- and Stage Dances 1720 (Edinburgh University Library, MS La.III. 673), a facsimile of which I had published a few years ago, and which turns out to form a case study linking these various strands.
The basic tools of historical research – sifting evidence from primary and secondary sources for biographical, bibliographical, topographic, iconographic and musicological evidence – each contribute to answering research questions; in this instance even at the most basic level of who was F. Le Roussau? Where did he work as a dancer or choreographer? How was he connected with the Dukes of Montagu? Nothing was known about Le Roussau beyond the title-pages of his manuscript Collection…1720 and his skilfully engraved notations of Anthony L’Abbé’s New Collection of Dances (the similarity of titles was probably deliberate) a few years later, in which he referred to himself respectively as ‘F. Le Roussau, Dancing-master’ and ‘Monsieur Roussau, Dancing-master’ living in London. It is clear from the 1720 manuscript that he had kept abreast of some of the French theatrical dance repertoire, either by seeing it in Paris or by discussing it closely with French dancers who came to London to perform at the Little Theatre, Haymarket. Newspapers of the time confirm that Le Roussau himself was also employed at that theatre, creating and performing comic and pastoral dances there. In the late-twentieth century a wild guess by a French dance specialist that he must have been named François was made on no convincing evidence, and the determination of several dance historians to spell his surname as ‘Rousseau’ added another layer of confusion which got the research hackles rising nicely.
Although not much is documented of the interrelationships of the Little Theatre in the Haymarket and Handel’s Royal Academy of Music just up the road in the King’s Theatre, they do reveal some important insights to Le Roussau. In 1719-20 Anthony L’Abbé was set to become the resident choreographer for Handel’s new Royal Academy operas, until the exorbitant costs of hiring Italian singers left no money in the budget for a dance troupe and such dancers as were required in Handel operas were probably borrowed from the Little Theatre (this is suggested by comparing the performance rostas of the two houses, for they usually alternated performance nights). That in turn led the research to Boughton, when it became apparent that the most significant patron of Le Roussau was probably John 2nd Duke of Montagu (1640-1749). The discovery at Boughton of a copy of L’Abbé’s New Collection as published by Le Roussau seemed a good omen.
In the 1720s the Little Theatre was practically owned by the Duke of Montagu, who was also one of the early directors of Handel’s Royal Academy. He would later employ Anthony L’Abbé to teach his daughter prior to her wedding in 1730, by which time L’Abbé had commissioned Le Roussau to notate and publish his New Collection of Dances; it is highly unlikely that the three men did not know each other. Indeed Le Roussau probably dedicated his Collection … 1720 to the Duke, for the first dance in it is named The Montaigu, and several of the dances unique to the manuscript reveal a sense of humour aimed at the Duke’s well-known love of masquerades and practical jokes. In The Montaigu Le Roussau alternates sections of minuet and gavotte during which two dancers spell out spatially, in their floor tracks, the letters of Montagu’s name. It was probably never intended to be performed and does not actually work well as a duet (we tried it out on Montagu’s descendant, the present Duke of Buccleuch, who owns the Montagu Music Collection at Boughton, and apparently only the letters M and O make any sense to an audience; the final letter (V, posing as the letter U as they were often interchangeable) is incomprehensible until you see that no matter from what direction you look at the notation, it is made up of interlocking Vs). But as a joke on paper the whole dance works very well.
The pursuit of these different avenues of historical context made it easier to solve the question of F. Le Roussau’s full name; not François but Ferdinand, who worked in London in the 1720s, before ending his days as dancing- and fencing-master to the Naval Academy at Portsmouth, where he died in 1736. Moreover it allowed consideration of a fourth question – how did Le Roussau’s Collection end up in Edinburgh when all the available information on his career in the 1720s indicates that he worked in London? The answer to that is tantalising, for although we know that Edinburgh University acquired the Collection in 1878 among the music books and papers of the Edinburgh bibliophile Dr David Laing (1793-1878), and that he often amassed them from booksellers and ‘the sweepings of some lawyer’s office’, as the EUL’s typescript Guide to MSS (1993) puts it, it is not known from where those dealers and lawyers had previously acquired them. John Duke of Montagu’s granddaughter Elizabeth married the 3rd Duke of Buccleuch in 1767 and removed to Dalkeith Palace near Edinburgh, and one cannot help wondering whether Le Roussau’s manuscript Collection may have strayed or been sold from there at some date in the nineteenth century. Regrettably, we’ll probably never know for sure.
The tools of historical research by definition cope well with many aspects of eighteenth-century dance. Academic and national libraries and archive repositories provide primary and secondary sources of relevance, and they also have facilities for consulting digitised collections and specialist databases held elsewhere, and present great scope for cooperative work. In due course the Montagu Music Collection at Boughton will also become accessible for research. While its dance component does not contain much that is unique, it nevertheless is strong on eighteenth century dance manuals and music, Scottish and English social dances, and late-eighteenth century London ballet scores.
Meanwhile, what about performance? These notated dances do not come to life, and cannot persuade modern choreographers that they have something powerful to offer, unless they are performed. At Boughton there have been two performances of music and dances based on the Montagu Music Collection, and a more ambitious performance at the Utrecht Early Music Festival in 2015, together with informal links with the Sound Heritage project at Southampton University and with EAERN. All have proved very successful.
We can learn from the pedagogic evidence of the day (and there is quite a lot of it) how people studied dance in the eighteenth century. The young apprentice dancer Kellom Tomlinson for instance learned his trade in 1708 by studying the commonest notation system of the time, Beauchamps-Feuillet, and he did so by notating standard steps in different time signatures, fitting them to a sample of music and finally graduating with the skills to record his own choreography according to the conventions of the day concerning symmetry and step vocabulary. That still remains a core element of analysing early-eighteenth century dances today, along with more complex discussions of rhythms, phrasing, expression and choreographic structure, and the practicalities of the subject will always require cooperation between specialist dancers, musicians and historians of costume and culture. There is of course also the sociable side of eighteenth century dancing, from ballrooms to village greens. Those dances can reveal a lot because they were part of everyday life for the people concerned. For much of the second half of the century they are well documented in novels, letters and diaries, formal regulations of assembly rooms, and innumerable collections of music with dance directions. They do not require years of training, the ability to read arcane dance notation, or profound analysis. Cotillions and country dances (both English and Caledonian) were hugely popular in the eighteenth century and also provide us today with enjoyable gateways into that world while enhancing our understanding of it.
John Butt is Gardiner Professor of Music at the University of Glasgow and musical director of Edinburgh’s Dunedin Consort. In this post, he reflects on his interests in eighteenth-century education and how this interest has inspired areas of his research.
I have always been interested in the role of education in the formation of musicians of all kinds, but in principle all aspects of education and its influence on culture, prosperity and the escape from deprivation, concern me. My first research activity centred on performing practices in the 18th century and this involved studying many pedagogic sources in addition to original manuscripts and editions. What soon became absolutely clear to me was that treatises and primers could not be read and understood in a vacuum and always required an understanding of the context of original writers and readers but also of the educational environment.
Much of my work as both researcher and performer has centred on J.S. Bach and I have always been fascinated by what we know of his own education and also by the backgrounds of those who sang and played for him, particularly the best singers in the school in Leipzig where he spent over half his working life. Something of this concern became the subject of a book back in 1994, which looked at music education in German (largely Lutheran) educational institutions from 1520-1800. One of the things that came out of this was my growing awareness of styles of learning and how these began to change in the seventeenth century (towards a more pupil- focussed approach) and then towards a more rationalised, accessible, approach in the eighteenth.
The latter century of course also witnesses the major growth in amateur performance together with an increasing sense of ‘division of labour’, by which professionals became more targeted towards one role or instrument. Attempting to understand these issues has had a profound influence on my approach to the performance of music, but also to the understanding of listenership as THE crucial (if not always evident) element in the health of any music culture.
A final way in which conceptions of music relate to eighteenth-century education lies in the rapid decline in the traditional cosmic view of music (i.e. as of a piece with God’s creation and the proportions of the universe) and the gradual development of music as a fine art somehow rooted in the depths of human expression. This helps explain something of the huge decline of music in certain traditional areas of education but its reciprocal growth in other areas of training and activity.
This blogpost is written by Dr Karen McAulay, Performing Arts Librarian and Postdoctoral Researcher at the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland. Karen has recently been awarded AHRC funding to establish a network, Claimed From Stationers’ Hall, researching early legal deposit music in British Libraries.
The University of St Andrew’s Library has a long and illustrious history, and its Special Collections contain many treasures. Compared to some of the rare and ancient print and manuscript tomes, the 460 bound volumes of assorted pieces of Georgian British sheet music might seem trivial by comparison. Nonetheless, the Copyright Music Collection, amassed under legal deposit largely between the end of the eighteenth century and 1836, was sorted and bound in sturdy volumes from 1801 onwards, even gaining its own handwritten catalogue in the 1820s. From that time, every music loan was recorded – along with all the textbooks and literature also acquired under legal deposit – in massive ledgers with pages for each professor or student. These documents have enabled me to examine in detail which music was popular, and with whom. The results of interrogating this data are particularly pertinent to the aims of EAERN, because it gives us such useful information about which late eighteenth and early nineteenth century music and instructional treatises, were actually being used in one particular university town. We can unearth titles that may have long been forgotten, and can quantify where a particular category of material was used by different kinds of borrowers.
For example, when a professor borrowed music on his own account, we don’t know who performed it at home. However, professors also borrowed music for their friends, many of them women, and in the first couple of decades of the nineteenth century, many were “Misses”. Their names were noted alongside the volumes that they took out. In the context of women’s education, this is all very interesting. Conversely, it is also interesting to me to observe how this musical activity fits into the other subjects that formed part of Regency education, which is why the EAERN network is so relevant to my research.
On the flyleaf of one of the volumes (UYLY 206/6, years 1814-19), I observed that some music had been returned from someone called Mrs Bertram:-
“1816. Feb: Music Nos. 17, 32, 130 sent from Mrs Bertrams & No.142 supposed to have been left there by Mr Henderson.”
Further down the page, another entry noted, “Retd by the Misses Bertram Music Nos.4”
The flyleaves of the ledgers are habitually filled with scribbled notes listing music and other items, perhaps jotted down in haste or before a new ledger was commenced; it would be easy to leap to false conclusions when there’s little information to go on. Nonetheless, there was a certain charm about the thought that Mrs Bertram had kindly returned not only her own music but someone else’s as well, and that her daughters had also brought music back to the library, perhaps around the same time.
Who, I wondered, was Mrs Bertram, and how many daughters did she have? She and her daughters borrowed music between 1813 and 1820 – before the catalogue had been completed. (We don’t know if it might already have been commenced.) We do know that the latest volume borrowed by the Bertrams was volume 203, containing music published in 1819.
We also know that the ladies borrowed through the good offices of several different professors! Professor Henry David Hill, Dr Robertson, Dr Briggs and Dr Haldane all signed music out for them. Moreover, although the author of the flyleaf note believed Mr Henderson to have left music at their house, the loan records seem to suggest otherwise, with none of the listed volumes having been issued to the Bertrams, nor to Mr Henderson, but two to other professors, and two to “Misses” who were not Bertrams, through the hands of other academics. Handwritten record-keeping wasn’t always easy. Who knows where the music had been before being returned to the library?!
Some detective-work in archival records and contemporary newspapers revealed an interesting story. Mrs Bertram, in fact, ran a successful boarding-school in St Leonards, until around March 1826 – the Fife Herald announced on Thursday 9th March that she was leaving St Andrews, where she had “so long and so successfully conducted the well known seminary for young ladies”. Her daughters also taught there. By August that year, she and four daughters were advertising her new boarding school, Newington House, in the Edinburgh Advertiser:- “The utmost attention is paid to the religious and moral instruction of the pupils. Newington House is delightfully situated in the southern suburbs of Edinburgh … Mrs Bertram expects, in a few weeks, to have the assistance of a Parisian lady, a Protestant …”
Much more could be related about Mrs Bertram’s circumstances, but suffice to say that her husband had been a published expert on farm horses, then a corn merchant in St Andrews until he ran into financial difficulties in 1808.
The Bertrams had five daughters and one son between 1792 and 1803; so one presumes that Mrs Bertram didn’t open her boarding school until some time in the second decade of the nineteenth century. (One girl seems to have died by 1826.) At the time her school in St Leonards was being sold, two of her daughters were improving their education in France.
She was at Newington House, a sizeable property in what looks to have been fairly generous gardens, until certainly 1833-4, but was living elsewhere in Edinburgh a couple of years later, and was living with three of her daughters, a married son and some servants in the 1841 census. By this stage Mrs Bertram was aged 80, certainly due a leisurely retirement.
A former Newington House teacher, Miss Foggo, opened a school with her own mother in 1835, boasting the teaching of theory of music, “teaching music in classes, the elementary parts on the Logerian System [a music teaching method] – Private Teaching as usual.” We could infer that Miss Foggo had taught along similar lines at Newington House, too.
Can we also infer that Mrs and the Misses Bertram borrowed music for the use of their pupils at St Leonard’s, before they moved to Edinburgh? I can offer no explanation for the fact that no further music was borrowed between 1820 and 1826. Nonetheless, a quick look at the music that they did borrow, between 1813-1820, reveals the borrowing of a couple of decidedly educational volumes, with instructional material for the harp and other topics:-
Mademoiselle Merelle’s Instructions for the pedal harp in two volumes (1899)
Kollmann’s Practical Guide to Thorough Bass (1801)
Instructions for the Piano & 8 Sonatinas by M. Camidge (1794)
A Treatise on practical Thorough Bass by Jackson (1791/5)
Instructions for ye pedal Harp (No title page)
A treatise on Harmony by Griffith Jones (1792/5)
Rules for Thorough Bass, op.7 by Smethergel (1791)
The Bertrams also borrowed a lot of piano music and songs, some national songs, not to mention vocal ensembles, hymns, organ voluntaries, dances and a ballet, and a couple of books of accompaniments.
There is ample evidence in William Thackeray’s satirical novel Vanity Fair (published in 1847, but set at the time of the Napoleonic Wars), that young ladies were taught music and dancing at boarding schools. It would thus not appear unreasonable to posit that Mrs Bertram and her daughters may well have used the University’s valuable music resource in instructing their pupils, or if not, then certainly in improving their own musical abilities in order to do so.
The Bertrams would have had about 200 volumes to choose from, by ca.1820. Their choices included some of the more popular volumes in the collection, although it is difficult to draw precise statistical conclusions about the popularity of individual volumes without also considering the contents of each volume, the date when it might have been bound, and the number of years it was available for borrowing.
Unearthing the history of Mrs Bertram and her boarding schools has also, in passing, enabled me to suggest a possible identification for the hitherto unknown subject of an early photograph taken by Edinburgh photographer David Octavius Hill in the mid-1840s. There are copies of these photographs at Glasgow University Library – they appear in the catalogue – and also in the Scottish National Portrait Gallery. A very old, but distinguished looking lady known only as “Mrs Bertram”, is captured sitting thoughtfully, holding a book and resting an arm on more books, from the earliest era of calotype photography. Our headmistress was certainly still alive in 1841, and would have been in her early to mid-eighties when the picture was taken. She was of the status that might have merited a portrait in this new medium. It cannot be proven indisputably, but it would be nice to think that I have found her.
Featured Image: With permission of University of Glasgow Library ASC, Shelf mark: HA0739.
We are very excited to announce our upcoming workshop series, which will take place at the University of Glasgow. Get your dancing shoes on and experience 18th-century Scottish country dance with The Nathaniel Gow Dance Band at our first workshop. This will take place at the University of Glasgow Concert Hall on Friday, 13 October at 1715-1900.
The next workshop will be delivered by Jennifer Thorp and Steve Player, where they will venture into discussions on deportment and decorum in a workshop entitled ‘Walk the Boards with a Natural Decorum?’. This takes place on Thursday, 9 November in Room 2, 14 University Gardens at 1715 and is a must for performers!
Ever wondered what 18th-century ladies did throughout their day? Workshop 3 ventures into the world of embroidery where Auburn Lucas will be discussing the intricacies and importance of sewing in the 18th century. This takes place on Thursday, 7 December in Room 2, 14 University Gardens at 1715 and there may be some opportunities to get up close and personal with some beautiful workshops of art. The perfect pre-Christmas treat.
In the New Year, Mhairi Lawson will kick off the workshop series on Thursday, 18 Januaryin Room 2, 14 University Gardens at 1715 with a workshop on 18th-century singing techniques. Perfect for all budding singers and instrumentalists alike!
Lesley Miller will be discussing the world of 18th-century French fashion in her workshop entitled ‘Weaving a path into art and commerce: the training and education of silk designers’, which will take place on Thursday, 8 February in Room 2, 14 University Gardens at 1715.
Last, but by no means least, Jed Wentz will treat us to a fascinating workshop on the art of gesture, which will take place on Friday, 2 March in the University of Glasgow Concert Hall at 1715.
All the workshop events are free and open to all, so we encourage you to come along. Refreshments will be available before and after each workshop. We encourage you to spread the word widely by sharing on social media and tagging us @EAERNing #EAERN&LEAERN.